Gort-Barten & Anor v M A Cherrington Ltd
There was no implied agreement and no implied terms imposing a design obligation on the Claimant; the scope of the Claimant's involvement in detailed design was governed by the express terms of the Contract, and it was not reasonable, necessary, obvious, or capable of clear expression to imply such a term in a...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr. and Mrs. Gort-Barten; Respondent: M. A. Cherrington Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Arbitration Award / Judgment on Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Implied Terms, Design and Build Contracts, Arbitration Appeals, Contract Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mr. and Mrs. Gort-Barten
Claimant
M. A. Cherrington Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Arbitration Award / Judgment on Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was an implied agreement or implied terms imposing a design obligation on the Claimant in a design and build contract
Ratio Decidendi
There was no implied agreement and no implied terms imposing a design obligation on the Claimant; the scope of the Claimant's involvement in detailed design was governed by the express terms of the Contract, and it was not reasonable, necessary, obvious, or capable of clear expression to imply such a term in a design and build contract.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- No implied agreement or implied terms imposing a design obligation on the Claimant
- No order as to costs; each party to bear their own legal and professional costs
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment