M v B [2016] EWHC 1657 (Fam) (10 June 2016)
The arrangement in 2013 was temporary due to the mother’s illness, not a permanent transfer of residence. The father’s retention of the children was wrongful under the extant 2008 French order. The passage of time and the children’s wishes do not amount to such a serious welfare consideration as to make...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2016] EWHC 1657 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant: M; Respondent: B
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Orders, Parental Responsibility, Child Welfare, Brussels II Revised Regulation, Hague Convention
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Applicant
B
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the French residence order of 2008 should be recognised and enforced in England under Brussels II Revised Regulation
- 2 Whether recognition/enforcement would be manifestly contrary to public policy under Article 23(a) taking into account the best interests of the children
Ratio Decidendi
The arrangement in 2013 was temporary due to the mother’s illness, not a permanent transfer of residence. The father’s retention of the children was wrongful under the extant 2008 French order. The passage of time and the children’s wishes do not amount to such a serious welfare consideration as to make recognition/enforcement manifestly contrary to public policy. The appeal fails; the French order must be recognised and enforced.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Recognition and enforcement of the 2008 French residence order in favour of the mother
- Discharge of Holman J's order preventing removal of children from jurisdiction
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment