M v F
M failed to prove on balance of probabilities that F sexually abused A, was emotionally abusive or coercively controlling towards M, or manipulated A or the maternal family. M's evidence lacked credibility, detail, and corroboration. No safeguarding reason exists to prevent A from having a full relationship with F; only welfare issue is F's alcohol consumption, which can be managed by undertaking.
- Parties
- Applicant: M; Respondent: F
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Children Act Proceedings / Fact Finding Hearing
- Outcome
- All allegations by M against F not proved; no safeguarding reason to restrict A's relationship with F.
- Legal Topics
- Domestic Abuse, Child Sexual Abuse Allegations, Coercive Control, Child Arrangements, Prohibited Steps Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Applicant
F
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Children Act Proceedings / Fact Finding Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether F sexually abused A
- 2 Whether F was emotionally abusive and manipulative towards A
- 3 Whether F was emotionally abusive and coercively controlling towards M
Ratio Decidendi
M failed to prove on balance of probabilities that F sexually abused A, was emotionally abusive or coercively controlling towards M, or manipulated A or the maternal family. M's evidence lacked credibility, detail, and corroboration. No safeguarding reason exists to prevent A from having a full relationship with F; only welfare issue is F's alcohol consumption, which can be managed by undertaking.
Court Disposition
All allegations by M against F not proved; no safeguarding reason to restrict A's relationship with F.
Orders
- No findings of sexual abuse, emotional abuse, or coercive control against F.
- Welfare issue of alcohol consumption to be managed by undertaking from F.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment