A Child (Discharge of SGO: local authority party status), Re

A Child (Discharge of SGO: local authority party status), Re

The default position under FPR 2010 r.12.3 is that the local authority party to the original care proceedings (LB Redbridge) remains a party to an application to discharge a special guardianship order, and there are insufficient grounds to depart from this default by substituting another local authority.

Parties
Applicant: M; Respondent: LB Redbridge; Respondent: the special guardians; Respondent: the child
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Family / Case Management Decision
Outcome
Application by LB Redbridge to be discharged as a party refused.
Legal Topics
Special Guardianship Order, Party Status, Local Authority Involvement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M

Applicant

LB Redbridge

Respondent

the special guardians

Respondent

the child

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family / Case Management Decision

  1. 1 Which local authority should be a respondent to an application to discharge a special guardianship order
  2. 2 Whether LB Redbridge should be discharged as a party

Ratio Decidendi

The default position under FPR 2010 r.12.3 is that the local authority party to the original care proceedings (LB Redbridge) remains a party to an application to discharge a special guardianship order, and there are insufficient grounds to depart from this default by substituting another local authority.

Court Disposition

Application by LB Redbridge to be discharged as a party refused.

Orders

  • LB Redbridge remains a party to the proceedings.