A Child (Discharge of SGO: local authority party status), Re
The default position under FPR 2010 r.12.3 is that the local authority party to the original care proceedings (LB Redbridge) remains a party to an application to discharge a special guardianship order, and there are insufficient grounds to depart from this default by substituting another local authority.
- Parties
- Applicant: M; Respondent: LB Redbridge; Respondent: the special guardians; Respondent: the child
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 15 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family / Case Management Decision
- Outcome
- Application by LB Redbridge to be discharged as a party refused.
- Legal Topics
- Special Guardianship Order, Party Status, Local Authority Involvement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Applicant
LB Redbridge
Respondent
the special guardians
Respondent
the child
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family / Case Management Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Which local authority should be a respondent to an application to discharge a special guardianship order
- 2 Whether LB Redbridge should be discharged as a party
Ratio Decidendi
The default position under FPR 2010 r.12.3 is that the local authority party to the original care proceedings (LB Redbridge) remains a party to an application to discharge a special guardianship order, and there are insufficient grounds to depart from this default by substituting another local authority.
Court Disposition
Application by LB Redbridge to be discharged as a party refused.
Orders
- LB Redbridge remains a party to the proceedings.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment