M v M [2009] EWHC 1941 (Fam) (29 July 2009)
The wife's application for transfer of the husband's company was wholly misconceived, based on false premises and expert misinterpretation, and her late change to a claim for periodical payments caused significant unnecessary costs. Her litigation conduct justified a departure from the general rule on costs, warranting an issue-based costs order for a fixed sum representing 20% of the husband's costs.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 1941 (Fam)
- Parties
- Applicant: M; Respondent: M
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Ancillary Relief (financial Provision Following Divorce) / Post Trial, Costs Directions
- Outcome
- Issue-based costs order granted against the wife.
- Legal Topics
- Ancillary Relief, Costs Orders, Issue Based Costs, Litigation Conduct
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Applicant
M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Ancillary Relief (financial Provision Following Divorce) / Post Trial, Costs Directions
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the wife should be ordered to pay a proportion of the husband's costs due to her conduct in litigation, specifically her application for transfer of the husband's company and late application for periodical payments.
Ratio Decidendi
The wife's application for transfer of the husband's company was wholly misconceived, based on false premises and expert misinterpretation, and her late change to a claim for periodical payments caused significant unnecessary costs. Her litigation conduct justified a departure from the general rule on costs, warranting an issue-based costs order for a fixed sum representing 20% of the husband's costs.
Court Disposition
Issue-based costs order granted against the wife.
Orders
- The wife is to pay the husband £175,000 towards his costs, representing approximately 20% of his untaxed costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment