M v M [2017] EWCA Civ 129 (01 February 2017)
The judge erred in principle by failing to explain how the wife's basic needs budget, which he accepted in evidence, could be trimmed to justify periodical payments below the shortfall. There was no finding of financial mismanagement or increased earning capacity. The order should have been for periodical payments...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] EWCA Civ 129
- Parties
- Applicant: M; Respondent: M
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 February 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; cross-appeal permission refused
- Legal Topics
- Variation of Periodical Payments, Clean Break, Needs Assessment, Earning Capacity, Financial Mismanagement
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Applicant
M
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the periodical payments order should be varied to meet the wife's basic needs
- 2 Whether the judge erred in not increasing the quantum of periodical payments
- 3 Whether the husband's application to re-open permission to appeal should be allowed
Ratio Decidendi
The judge erred in principle by failing to explain how the wife's basic needs budget, which he accepted in evidence, could be trimmed to justify periodical payments below the shortfall. There was no finding of financial mismanagement or increased earning capacity. The order should have been for periodical payments of £1,441 per month until further order.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; cross-appeal permission refused
Orders
- Order set aside
- Substituted order for periodical payments of £1,441 per calendar month until further order
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment