M, R. v
The judge was correct to impose a hospital and limitation direction under section 45A as the statute requires both when the conditions are met, regardless of whether the section 41 criteria for a restriction order are satisfied. The victim surcharge order was not appropriate as part of the offence occurred before 1 October 2012 and no fine was imposed.
- Parties
- Applicant: M; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 22 July 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against hospital and limitation direction dismissed; appeal against victim surcharge order allowed
- Legal Topics
- Hospital and Limitation Directions, Victim Surcharge Order, Interpretation of Mental Health Act 1983, Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the judge was wrong in principle to make a section 45A hospital and limitation direction when the conditions for a restriction order under section 41 were not met
- 2 Whether a section 37 order was the appropriate order
- 3 Whether the victim surcharge order was lawfully imposed
Ratio Decidendi
The judge was correct to impose a hospital and limitation direction under section 45A as the statute requires both when the conditions are met, regardless of whether the section 41 criteria for a restriction order are satisfied. The victim surcharge order was not appropriate as part of the offence occurred before 1 October 2012 and no fine was imposed.
Court Disposition
Appeal against hospital and limitation direction dismissed; appeal against victim surcharge order allowed
Orders
- Victim surcharge order quashed
- Hospital and limitation direction under section 45A Mental Health Act 1983 upheld
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment