Children: Parental Responsibility [2025] EWFC 462 (29 August 2025)
M2's inability to accept the court's findings, her implacable hostility to F, and her ongoing behaviour present a significant risk of emotional harm to RF and AF if she retains parental responsibility or unsupervised contact. The police disclosure and new evidence do not undermine the February 2025 findings on parentage. F should be granted parental responsibility for RF and AF. M2's parental responsibility for RF and AF should be removed. M2 should not have parental responsibility or contact with FA. Contact between M2 and RF/AF should be supervised. Applications for baptism, foreign passports, and unrestricted travel are refused. The welfare of the children requires a clear, stable...
- Citation
- [2025] EWFC 462
- Parties
- Applicant: M1; Respondent 1/cross Applicant 1: M2; Respondent 2/cross Applicant 2: F; Respondents 3 5: RF, AF and FA (by their Children's Guardian Mr B)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Children / Final Welfare Hearing Following Fact Finding and Parentage Declarations
- Outcome
- M2's applications to set aside the February 2025 judgment, for parental responsibility for FA, for adoption, for baptism, for foreign passports, and for unrestricted travel are refused. F is granted parental responsibility for RF and AF. M2's parental responsibility for RF and AF is removed. M2 is to have only...
- Legal Topics
- Parental Responsibility, Child Arrangements Orders, Declarations of Parentage, Prohibited Steps Orders, Change of Surname, Removal of Parental Responsibility, Adoption, Specific Issue Orders, Disclosure of Court Papers, Relocation, Supervised Contact, S91(14) Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M1
Applicant
M2
Respondent 1/cross Applicant 1
F
Respondent 2/cross Applicant 2
RF, AF and FA (by their Children's Guardian Mr B)
Respondents 3 5
Procedural Posture
Family Law Children / Final Welfare Hearing Following Fact Finding and Parentage Declarations
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether M2's parental responsibility for RF and AF should be removed
- 2 Whether F should be granted parental responsibility for RF and AF
- 3 Whether M2 should have parental responsibility for FA
Ratio Decidendi
M2's inability to accept the court's findings, her implacable hostility to F, and her ongoing behaviour present a significant risk of emotional harm to RF and AF if she retains parental responsibility or unsupervised contact. The police disclosure and new evidence do not undermine the February 2025 findings on parentage. F should be granted parental responsibility for RF and AF. M2's parental responsibility for RF and AF should be removed. M2 should not have parental responsibility or contact with FA. Contact between M2 and RF/AF should be supervised. Applications for baptism, foreign passports, and unrestricted travel are refused. The welfare of the children requires a clear, stable...
Court Disposition
M2's applications to set aside the February 2025 judgment, for parental responsibility for FA, for adoption, for baptism, for foreign passports, and for unrestricted travel are refused. F is granted parental responsibility for RF and AF. M2's parental responsibility for RF and AF is removed. M2 is to have only...
Orders
- F granted parental responsibility for RF and AF
- M2's parental responsibility for RF and AF removed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment