MA v Gateshead Council & Ors [2024] EWCOP 34 (T1) (19 June 2024)
A two-week trial placement at home is in MA's best interests as it is the least restrictive option, accords with her lifelong wishes and feelings, and can be managed with an appropriate care plan and assistive technology. The risks are not so great as to outweigh the benefits, and the trial is reversible with her place at Placement 1 retained.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCOP 34
- Parties
- Applicant: MA; First Respondent: Gateshead Council; Second Respondent: SIA; Third Respondent: TA; Fourth Respondent: DA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Section 21 a Mental Capacity Act 2005 Challenge / Contested Hearing on Best Interests Regarding Trial Home Placement
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- Best Interests, Deprivation of Liberty, Care and Residence, Section 21 a Challenge, Article 8 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MA
Applicant
Gateshead Council
First Respondent
SIA
Second Respondent
TA
Third Respondent
DA
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 21 a Mental Capacity Act 2005 Challenge / Contested Hearing on Best Interests Regarding Trial Home Placement
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is in MA's best interests to have a two-week trial placement at home with a care package rather than remain at Placement 1
Ratio Decidendi
A two-week trial placement at home is in MA's best interests as it is the least restrictive option, accords with her lifelong wishes and feelings, and can be managed with an appropriate care plan and assistive technology. The risks are not so great as to outweigh the benefits, and the trial is reversible with her place at Placement 1 retained.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- MA is authorised to have a two-week trial placement at home with a care package; her room at Placement 1 remains available in the event of breakdown.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment