MA v Gateshead Council & Ors
A two-week trial placement at home is authorised as it is the least restrictive option, aligns with MA’s lifelong wishes and feelings, and can be managed with an appropriate care plan and technology, while her room at Placement 1 remains available in case of breakdown; the balance of advantages and disadvantages is finely balanced but favours the trial at home.
- Parties
- Applicant: MA; First Respondent: Gateshead Council; Second Respondent: SIA; Third Respondent: TA; Fourth Respondent: DA
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 26 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Section 21 a Mental Capacity Act Application / Contested Hearing; Judgment
- Outcome
- Trial placement at home authorised
- Legal Topics
- Best Interests, Deprivation of Liberty, Care and Residence, Article 8 ECHR, Least Restrictive Option
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MA
Applicant
Gateshead Council
First Respondent
SIA
Second Respondent
TA
Third Respondent
DA
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Section 21 a Mental Capacity Act Application / Contested Hearing; Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Is it in MA’s best interests to have a trial placement at home with a package of care rather than remain at Placement 1?
Ratio Decidendi
A two-week trial placement at home is authorised as it is the least restrictive option, aligns with MA’s lifelong wishes and feelings, and can be managed with an appropriate care plan and technology, while her room at Placement 1 remains available in case of breakdown; the balance of advantages and disadvantages is finely balanced but favours the trial at home.
Court Disposition
Trial placement at home authorised
Orders
- MA to have a two-week trial placement at home with a package of care as proposed.
- MA’s room at Placement 1 to remain available during the trial period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment