Mabengo, R. v [2008] EWCA Crim 1699 (18 June 2008)
The sentences of twelve months' imprisonment were not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle given the deliberate use of false passports to conceal true status and obtain employment; however, the judge failed to conduct a sufficient balancing exercise before making deportation orders, which must be quashed.
- Citation
- [2008] EWCA Crim 1699
- Parties
- Appellant: Mabengo Mabengo; Appellant: Mbango Lomoka; Appellant: Kazadi Salang; Appellant: Manzambi Birindwa; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal partially allowed
- Legal Topics
- False Identity Documents, Deportation, Sentencing Guidelines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mabengo Mabengo
Appellant
Mbango Lomoka
Appellant
Kazadi Salang
Appellant
Manzambi Birindwa
Appellant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentences of twelve months' imprisonment for possession of false identity documents were excessive
- 2 Whether the orders for deportation were appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences of twelve months' imprisonment were not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle given the deliberate use of false passports to conceal true status and obtain employment; however, the judge failed to conduct a sufficient balancing exercise before making deportation orders, which must be quashed.
Court Disposition
appeal partially allowed
Orders
- sentences of twelve months' imprisonment upheld
- orders for deportation quashed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment