Macarthys Ltd v Smith (No.2) [1980] EWCA Civ 7 (17 April 1980)
Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome, as incorporated by the European Communities Act 1972, overrides any inconsistent provision of the Equal Pay Act 1970, entitling a woman to equal pay with a male predecessor even if they were not employed contemporaneously.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [1980] EWCA Civ 7
- Parties
- Appellant: Macarthys Limited; Respondent: Wendy Smith
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 April 1980
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Equal Pay, Sex Discrimination, Direct Effect of EU Law, Statutory Interpretation
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Macarthys Limited
Appellant
Wendy Smith
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Appeal From Employment Appeal Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Equal Pay Act 1970 require contemporaneous employment for comparison?
- 2 Does Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome override inconsistent provisions of the Equal Pay Act 1970?
- 3 Is Community law directly applicable and supreme over inconsistent national law in the context of equal pay?
Ratio Decidendi
Article 119 of the Treaty of Rome, as incorporated by the European Communities Act 1972, overrides any inconsistent provision of the Equal Pay Act 1970, entitling a woman to equal pay with a male predecessor even if they were not employed contemporaneously.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed with costs in this court to be paid by Macarthys Limited.
- Certificate for two counsel granted to respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment