Sherwood & Casson Ltd v Mackenzie [1999] EWHC 274 (TCC) (30 November 1999)
The court determined that the second adjudicator had jurisdiction because the dispute referred was not substantially the same as the previous adjudication; the Final Account involved remeasurement and new claims, and the adjudicator's decision was within his statutory authority. The adjudicator was not required to resign, and his decision is enforceable.
- Citation
- [1999] EWHC 274 (TCC)
- Parties
- Claimant: Sherwood; Defendant: Mackenzie
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Summary Judgment Application (part 8 Cpr) / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for claimant
- Legal Topics
- Adjudication Enforcement, Jurisdiction, Contractual Disputes, Statutory Scheme
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sherwood
Claimant
Mackenzie
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Summary Judgment Application (part 8 Cpr) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second adjudicator had jurisdiction to decide the dispute referred to him
- 2 Whether the dispute referred was substantially the same as a previous adjudication
- 3 Whether the adjudicator should have resigned under paragraph 9(2) of the Scheme
Ratio Decidendi
The court determined that the second adjudicator had jurisdiction because the dispute referred was not substantially the same as the previous adjudication; the Final Account involved remeasurement and new claims, and the adjudicator's decision was within his statutory authority. The adjudicator was not required to resign, and his decision is enforceable.
Court Disposition
judgment for claimant
Orders
- Sherwood is entitled to £14,198.26 (comprising £12,586.39 and £1,611.87)
- Interest at 6% from 7 October 1999 to 2 December 1999 (simple interest)
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment