Littlestone & Ors v Macleish [2016] EWCA Civ 127 (10 March 2016)
Admissions payment is a payment on account of the claim and should not be aggregated with the Part 36 offer for costs consequences; claimant obtained a judgment more advantageous than the Part 36 offer. Contractual clause entitles claimant to costs on indemnity basis, not standard basis.
- Citation
- [2016] EWCA Civ 127
- Parties
- Appellants: Littlestone and Others; Respondent: Macleish
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From County Court Judgment / Court of Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Part 36 Offers, Contractual Indemnity, Lease Obligations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Littlestone and Others
Appellants
Macleish
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From County Court Judgment / Court of Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Part 36 offer should be aggregated with admissions payment for costs consequences
- 2 Whether costs should be awarded on indemnity basis under contractual entitlement
Ratio Decidendi
Admissions payment is a payment on account of the claim and should not be aggregated with the Part 36 offer for costs consequences; claimant obtained a judgment more advantageous than the Part 36 offer. Contractual clause entitles claimant to costs on indemnity basis, not standard basis.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal allowed.
Orders
- Claimant awarded costs of proceedings on indemnity basis.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment