Magro, R v [2010] EWCA Crim 1575 (08 July 2010)
The Court is bound by the decision in Clarke, which prohibits confiscation orders when an absolute or conditional discharge is imposed, despite arguments that the statutory regime permits such orders; only the Supreme Court can overturn Clarke.
- Citation
- [2010] EWCA Crim 1575
- Parties
- Prosecution: R; Applicant: Magro; Applicant: Brissett; Applicant: Smith; Applicant: Varma
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Varma's appeal allowed; time extended; point of law certified; other applications adjourned pending Supreme Court decision.
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Orders, Absolute Discharge, Conditional Discharge, Sentencing Powers, Jurisdiction of Crown Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
R
Prosecution
Magro
Applicant
Brissett
Applicant
Smith
Applicant
Varma
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Crown Court have power to make a confiscation order when the sentence is absolute or conditional discharge?
- 2 Is the decision in R v Clarke [2009] EWCA Crim 1074 binding and correct?
Ratio Decidendi
The Court is bound by the decision in Clarke, which prohibits confiscation orders when an absolute or conditional discharge is imposed, despite arguments that the statutory regime permits such orders; only the Supreme Court can overturn Clarke.
Court Disposition
Varma's appeal allowed; time extended; point of law certified; other applications adjourned pending Supreme Court decision.
Orders
- Varma's confiscation order quashed.
- Time extended for Varma's appeal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment