Ayres v Odedra

Ayres v Odedra

The defendant failed to pay sufficient attention to the claimant’s position and misjudged his manoeuvre, causing the accident. Primary liability lies with the defendant, but the claimant’s behaviour contributed to the accident. Liability apportioned 80% to the defendant and 20% to the claimant.

Parties
Claimant: Robert Ian Ayres; Litigation Friend: Sue Ayres; Defendant: Mahesh Odedra
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
18 January 2013
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury Claim / Liability Trial
Outcome
Liability apportioned: 80% defendant, 20% claimant.
Legal Topics
Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Duty of Care, Pedestrian Accident
Tort Personal Injury Negligence Contributory Negligence Duty of Care Pedestrian Accident

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Robert Ian Ayres

Claimant

Sue Ayres

Litigation Friend

Mahesh Odedra

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Personal Injury Claim / Liability Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Was the claimant knocked to the ground by the defendant’s car or did he just lose his balance and fall?
  2. 2 Did the defendant act intentionally or recklessly?
  3. 3 Is primary liability established?

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant failed to pay sufficient attention to the claimant’s position and misjudged his manoeuvre, causing the accident. Primary liability lies with the defendant, but the claimant’s behaviour contributed to the accident. Liability apportioned 80% to the defendant and 20% to the claimant.

Court Disposition

Liability apportioned: 80% defendant, 20% claimant.

Orders

  • Defendant found primarily liable for accident.
  • Claimant found contributorily negligent at 20%.