Dar Al Arkan Real Estate Development Company & Anor v Al-Sayed Bader Hashim Al Refai & Ors [2014] EWHC 1055 (Comm) (11 April 2014)

Dar Al Arkan Real Estate Development Company & Anor v Al-Sayed Bader Hashim Al Refai & Ors [2014] EWHC 1055 (Comm) (11 April 2014)

The committal application for contempt should be heard before the trial to uphold the court's authority and ensure procedural fairness, despite some overlap with substantive issues. However, due to detailed and adverse prior findings on credibility and facts central to the contempt application, the presiding judge must recuse himself to avoid apparent bias.

Citation
[2014] EWHC 1055 (Comm)
Parties
Claimant: Dar Al Arkan Real Estate Development Company; Claimant: Bank Alkhair BSC; Defendant: Majid Al-Sayed Bader Hashim Al Refai; Defendant: Kroll Associates UK Limited; Defendant: Alexander Richardson; Claimant's Managing Director/individual Subject to Committal: Sheikh Abdullatif Al Shalash
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
11 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Committal Application (contempt of Court) Within Commercial Litigation / Interlocutory Management Decision on Timing, Recusal, and Admissibility Prior to Trial
Outcome
Application for early hearing of committal granted; judge recuses himself from hearing the committal application; no ruling on admissibility of prior judgment.
Legal Topics
Committal for Contempt, Case Management, Recusal of Judge, Admissibility of Prior Judgments, Breach of Undertaking, Preservation of Evidence
Civil Procedure Commercial Law Contempt of Court Committal for Contempt Case Management Recusal of Judge Admissibility of Prior Judgments Breach of Undertaking +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 18 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Dar Al Arkan Real Estate Development Company

Claimant

Bank Alkhair BSC

Claimant

Majid Al-Sayed Bader Hashim Al Refai

Defendant

Kroll Associates UK Limited

Defendant

Alexander Richardson

Defendant

Sheikh Abdullatif Al Shalash

Claimant's Managing Director/individual Subject to Committal

Procedural Posture

Committal Application (contempt of Court) Within Commercial Litigation / Interlocutory Management Decision on Timing, Recusal, and Admissibility Prior to Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 When should the committal application for contempt be heard—before or after trial?
  2. 2 Should the presiding judge recuse himself from hearing the committal application due to prior findings?
  3. 3 What use, if any, may be made of the judge's prior findings in the committal application?

Ratio Decidendi

The committal application for contempt should be heard before the trial to uphold the court's authority and ensure procedural fairness, despite some overlap with substantive issues. However, due to detailed and adverse prior findings on credibility and facts central to the contempt application, the presiding judge must recuse himself to avoid apparent bias.

Court Disposition

Application for early hearing of committal granted; judge recuses himself from hearing the committal application; no ruling on admissibility of prior judgment.

Orders

  • Committal application to be heard before trial by a different judge.
  • Mr Justice Andrew Smith recuses himself from hearing the committal application.