Daley v Bakiyev [2016] EWHC 1972 (QB) (29 July 2016)

Daley v Bakiyev [2016] EWHC 1972 (QB) (29 July 2016)

The Claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the Defendant organised or arranged the attempted murder. The evidence, including hearsay and circumstantial material, was insufficiently cogent to overcome the inherent improbability of the allegation. There was no direct evidence linking the Defendant to the attack, and the hearsay evidence was unreliable and uncorroborated. The claim is therefore dismissed.

Citation
[2016] EWHC 1972
Parties
Claimant: Sean Daley; Defendant: Maksim Bakiyev
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 July 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim for Damages (tort Personal Injury/attempted Murder) / High Court Trial Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Attempted Murder, Vicarious Liability, Damages, Hearsay Evidence, Standard of Proof, Fraud, Limitation
Tort Law Personal Injury International Law Attempted Murder Vicarious Liability Damages Hearsay Evidence Standard of Proof +2 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 8 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Sean Daley

Claimant

Maksim Bakiyev

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim for Damages (tort Personal Injury/attempted Murder) / High Court Trial Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Defendant, Maksim Bakiyev, organised or arranged the attempted murder of the Claimant, Sean Daley
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant had a financial or other interest in the Jerooy gold mine or Global Gold
  3. 3 Whether the evidence, including hearsay, is sufficient to establish liability on the balance of probabilities

Ratio Decidendi

The Claimant failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the Defendant organised or arranged the attempted murder. The evidence, including hearsay and circumstantial material, was insufficiently cogent to overcome the inherent improbability of the allegation. There was no direct evidence linking the Defendant to the attack, and the hearsay evidence was unreliable and uncorroborated. The claim is therefore dismissed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed

Orders

  • Claim for damages dismissed
  • No order as to costs specified in the provided text