Media CAT Ltd v Adams & Ors [2011] EWPCC 10 (18 April 2011)
The court found a strong prima facie case that ACS:Law and Andrew Crossley entered into improper and champertous revenue sharing arrangements in breach of the Solicitors' Code of Conduct, and that the service of Notices of Discontinuance constituted unreasonable conduct and an abuse of process. These actions caused...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] EWPCC 10
- Parties
- Claimant: MEDIA C. A. T Limited; Defendant: Malcolm Adams; Defendant: Hooper; Defendant: Mitchell Chance; Defendant: Mark Jimack; Defendant: Miss Maria Shewan; Defendant: Sean Allen; Defendant: Christopher Beck; Defendant: Danny Cowan; Defendant: Glyn Bentley; Defendant: Pana Begum; Defendant: Peter Armitage; Defendant: Allan Billington; Defendant: James Bryant; Defendant: Julia Abbott; Defendant: Christopher Birkett; Defendant: M Brunt; Defendant: Gareth Bacon; Defendant: Wayne Bacon; Defendant: Michelle McGlade; Defendant: David Bick; Solicitor for the Claimant: ACS:Law and Andrew Crossley
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Copyright Infringement Claim / Post Trial, Costs and Wasted Costs Applications
- Outcome
- Stage one wasted costs order made against ACS:Law/Andrew Crossley limited to revenue sharing arrangements and service of Notices of Discontinuance; ACS:Law/Andrew Crossley to be joined as a party for the purposes of a third party costs order; all actions struck out; Media CAT to pay defendants' costs.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Infringement, Wasted Costs, Champerty, Abuse of Process, Third Party Costs Orders, Solicitors' Code of Conduct, Conditional Fee Agreements
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MEDIA C. A. T Limited
Claimant
Malcolm Adams
Defendant
Hooper
Defendant
Mitchell Chance
Defendant
Mark Jimack
Defendant
Miss Maria Shewan
Defendant
Sean Allen
Defendant
Christopher Beck
Defendant
Danny Cowan
Defendant
Glyn Bentley
Defendant
Pana Begum
Defendant
Peter Armitage
Defendant
Allan Billington
Defendant
James Bryant
Defendant
Julia Abbott
Defendant
Christopher Birkett
Defendant
M Brunt
Defendant
Gareth Bacon
Defendant
Wayne Bacon
Defendant
Michelle McGlade
Defendant
David Bick
Defendant
ACS:Law and Andrew Crossley
Solicitor for the Claimant
Procedural Posture
Copyright Infringement Claim / Post Trial, Costs and Wasted Costs Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether ACS:Law and/or Andrew Crossley should be subject to a wasted costs order for improper, unreasonable, or negligent conduct in the litigation.
- 2 Whether ACS:Law and/or Andrew Crossley should be joined as a party for the purposes of a third party costs order under s51 of the Senior Courts Act 1981.
- 3 Whether the revenue sharing agreements between Media CAT and ACS:Law were improper and champertous.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found a strong prima facie case that ACS:Law and Andrew Crossley entered into improper and champertous revenue sharing arrangements in breach of the Solicitors' Code of Conduct, and that the service of Notices of Discontinuance constituted unreasonable conduct and an abuse of process. These actions caused the defendants to incur unnecessary costs. The court made a stage one wasted costs order limited to these issues and found a good arguable case to join ACS:Law/Crossley as a party for a third party costs order. Other alleged misconduct did not satisfy the proportionality test for wasted costs.
Court Disposition
Stage one wasted costs order made against ACS:Law/Andrew Crossley limited to revenue sharing arrangements and service of Notices of Discontinuance; ACS:Law/Andrew Crossley to be joined as a party for the purposes of a third party costs order; all actions struck out; Media CAT to pay defendants' costs.
Orders
- Actions struck out.
- Media CAT to pay defendants' costs on an indemnity basis, scale costs provisions disapplied.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment