Stephenson, R. v [2019] EWCA Crim 2418 (19 December 2019)
The sentence of 12 months' imprisonment was manifestly excessive given the mitigating factors, the attempted nature of the offence, and the appellant's personal circumstances. A suspended sentence with a rehabilitation requirement was appropriate, and the sexual harm prevention order should be reduced to 7 years to match the notification period.
- Citation
- [2019] EWCA Crim 2418
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Malcolm Stephenson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Sexual Offences, Appeal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Malcolm Stephenson
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed for attempted sexual communication with a child was manifestly excessive
- 2 Whether a custodial sentence was necessary or if a community order was appropriate
- 3 Appropriate duration of a sexual harm prevention order
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence of 12 months' imprisonment was manifestly excessive given the mitigating factors, the attempted nature of the offence, and the appellant's personal circumstances. A suspended sentence with a rehabilitation requirement was appropriate, and the sexual harm prevention order should be reduced to 7 years to match the notification period.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed
Orders
- Sentence of 12 months' imprisonment quashed
- Substituted with 6 months' imprisonment suspended for 2 years
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment