Miah, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 465 (01 April 2025)

The fleeting and unexplained references to 'MOSOVO' and the vague statement by Complainant 1's father did not create a real danger of prejudice in the minds of the jury, and therefore the convictions were safe.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] EWCA Crim 465
Parties: Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Mamunroshid Miah
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 01 April 2025
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome: renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
Legal Topics: False Imprisonment, Assault by Beating, Breach of Sexual Harm Prevention Order, Jury Prejudice, Appeal Against Conviction

Criminal Law False Imprisonment Assault by Beating Breach of Sexual Harm Prevention Order Jury Prejudice Appeal Against Conviction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Mamunroshid Miah

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

Legal Issues

1 Whether references to 'MOSOVO' and vague statements by Complainant 1's father rendered the conviction unsafe by prejudicing the jury

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused

Orders

Application for leave to appeal against conviction refused

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.