Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust v Namiq & Anor
The balance of interests in this case falls in favour of granting the reporting restriction order to anonymise treating clinical and nursing staff, given the public interest in allowing them to perform their duties without risk of hostile media attention, and minimal harm to open justice as proceedings and judgment are public.
- Parties
- Applicant: Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust; First Respondent: Midrar Namiq; Second Respondent: Mr Karwan Mohammed Ali; Third Respondent: Ms Shokhan Namiq
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 January 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Family Division Application / Ruling on Reporting Restriction Order
- Outcome
- Reporting restriction order extended to cover treating clinical and nursing staff.
- Legal Topics
- Reporting Restriction Orders, Open Justice, Anonymity of Healthcare Professionals, Article 8 ECHR, Article 10 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Applicant
Midrar Namiq
First Respondent
Mr Karwan Mohammed Ali
Second Respondent
Ms Shokhan Namiq
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Family Division Application / Ruling on Reporting Restriction Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether to continue a reporting restriction order anonymising treating clinicians and nursing staff
- 2 Balancing open justice and transparency against privacy and protection of healthcare professionals
Ratio Decidendi
The balance of interests in this case falls in favour of granting the reporting restriction order to anonymise treating clinical and nursing staff, given the public interest in allowing them to perform their duties without risk of hostile media attention, and minimal harm to open justice as proceedings and judgment are public.
Court Disposition
Reporting restriction order extended to cover treating clinical and nursing staff.
Orders
- Reporting restriction order continued in same terms as previously granted, covering treating clinical and nursing staff.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment