R v Mandeep Singh Rajwansee

R v Mandeep Singh Rajwansee

The sentencing judge was correct to assess medium culpability based on evidence of ledgers and cash, but erred in restricting the guilty plea discount to 10% on counts 3, 4, and 5; full discount should have been given. Refusal to suspend the sentence was not wrong in principle given the seriousness of the offences.

Source-derived case information.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Mandeep Singh Rajwansee
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
22 October 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal allowed in part
Legal Topics
Money Laundering, Sentencing, Guilty Plea Discount, Suspension of Sentence
Criminal Law Money Laundering Sentencing Guilty Plea Discount Suspension of Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Mandeep Singh Rajwansee

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in assessing culpability based on ledgers not charged or admitted
  2. 2 Whether sufficient credit for guilty plea was given
  3. 3 Whether the sentence should have been suspended

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge was correct to assess medium culpability based on evidence of ledgers and cash, but erred in restricting the guilty plea discount to 10% on counts 3, 4, and 5; full discount should have been given. Refusal to suspend the sentence was not wrong in principle given the seriousness of the offences.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed in part

Orders

  • Sentence on count 1 remains at 18 months imprisonment
  • Sentence on count 3 reduced to 13 months imprisonment, concurrent