Manolete Partners Plc v Matta & Ors [2020] EWHC 2965 (Ch) (05 November 2020)
Dr Matta breached his duties as director under CA 2006 by authorising and failing to regularise substantial personal expenditure via the director's loan account and by making payments to the Fourth Respondent unrelated to company business. The evidence was insufficient to determine, on a summary basis, whether...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2020] EWHC 2965 (Ch)
- Parties
- Applicant: Manolete Partners PLC; First Respondent: Dr Amir Shafik Matta; Second Respondent: Mrs Raghida Matta; Third Respondent: Ms Sara Matta; Fourth Respondent: MMJ Global Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 05 November 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Originating Application / Summary Judgment Hearing
- Outcome
- Partially allowed
- Legal Topics
- Director's Duties, Transactions at an Undervalue, Preferences, Director's Loan Account, Assignment of Claims
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manolete Partners PLC
Applicant
Dr Amir Shafik Matta
First Respondent
Mrs Raghida Matta
Second Respondent
Ms Sara Matta
Third Respondent
MMJ Global Limited
Fourth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Originating Application / Summary Judgment Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Dr Matta breached his duties as director under CA 2006 regarding the director's loan account and payments to respondents
- 2 Whether payments to Second, Third, and Fourth Respondents were transactions at an undervalue or preferences under IA 1986
- 3 Whether Dr Matta is liable to repay sums to the Applicant
Ratio Decidendi
Dr Matta breached his duties as director under CA 2006 by authorising and failing to regularise substantial personal expenditure via the director's loan account and by making payments to the Fourth Respondent unrelated to company business. The evidence was insufficient to determine, on a summary basis, whether payments to the Second and Third Respondents were transactions at an undervalue or preferences under IA 1986.
Court Disposition
Partially allowed
Orders
- Dr Matta is liable to pay the Applicant the overdrawn sum on the director's loan account as at administration.
- Dr Matta is liable to pay the Applicant the sums paid to the Fourth Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment