Adam & Anor, R v
The original confiscation orders are quashed and substituted with orders reflecting the benefit amount of £16,250 per appellant, with a 9-month default imprisonment period and payment within 6 months.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Appellant: Maqbul Adam; Appellant: Altaf Umarji; Respondent: The Crown
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Confiscation Orders
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part; original confiscation orders quashed; substituted orders imposed
- Legal Topics
- Confiscation Orders, Benefit From Crime, Appeal Procedure
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maqbul Adam
Appellant
Altaf Umarji
Appellant
The Crown
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Confiscation Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the original confiscation orders should be quashed and substituted with new orders
- 2 Determination of the benefit amount and terms of the substituted confiscation orders
Ratio Decidendi
The original confiscation orders are quashed and substituted with orders reflecting the benefit amount of £16,250 per appellant, with a 9-month default imprisonment period and payment within 6 months.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part; original confiscation orders quashed; substituted orders imposed
Orders
- Original confiscation orders quashed
- Substituted confiscation order of £16,250 against each appellant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment