R v Marc Alun Williams
The proposed appeal has no prospect of success as the jury was entitled to reach its verdict based on the evidence, alleged failures in police investigation were considered at trial, and the applicant had the opportunity to challenge the evidence. The expert reports and character references do not constitute fresh...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Applicant: Marc Alun Williams
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Attempted Sexual Communication With a Child, Abuse of Process, Fresh Evidence, Police Investigation, Jury Composition
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Marc Alun Williams
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 whether alleged failures in police investigation rendered the conviction unsafe
- 2 whether prosecution constituted an abuse of process
- 3 whether fresh evidence should be admitted
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed appeal has no prospect of success as the jury was entitled to reach its verdict based on the evidence, alleged failures in police investigation were considered at trial, and the applicant had the opportunity to challenge the evidence. The expert reports and character references do not constitute fresh evidence, and the juror's police affiliation does not render the conviction unsafe.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal refused
Orders
- renewed application for leave to appeal is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment