R v Marcus Jermaine Osborne
The judge properly considered the applicant's guilty pleas and the sexual nature of the offending. The offences were of such exceptional seriousness, involving two planned and brutal murders with sexual and sadistic conduct, that whole life orders were justified despite the guilty pleas. The case was not borderline and the sentence was not manifestly excessive.
- Parties
- Appellant: Marcus Jermaine Osborne; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 February 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Rape, False Imprisonment, Sentencing, Whole Life Order, Aggravating Factors, Mitigating Factors, Guilty Plea Credit
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marcus Jermaine Osborne
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge failed to give sufficient weight to the applicant's guilty pleas when imposing whole life orders for murder
- 2 Whether the judge overemphasised the sexual nature of the offending in determining sentence
Ratio Decidendi
The judge properly considered the applicant's guilty pleas and the sexual nature of the offending. The offences were of such exceptional seriousness, involving two planned and brutal murders with sexual and sadistic conduct, that whole life orders were justified despite the guilty pleas. The case was not borderline and the sentence was not manifestly excessive.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment