Stephen David Margulies v Marcus Jonathan Margulies
The claim is barred by cause of action estoppel and issue estoppel as the facts and issues were previously litigated and decided against Stephen in the 1997 proceedings and Court of Appeal. No special circumstances or new material evidence justify re-opening the matter. The claim is also an abuse of process and has no realistic prospect of success.
- Parties
- Claimant: Stephen David Margulies; Defendant: Marcus Jonathan Margulies
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 November 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application for Strike Out and Summary Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim struck out
- Legal Topics
- Secret Trusts, Res Judicata, Issue Estoppel, Abuse of Process, Summary Judgment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen David Margulies
Claimant
Marcus Jonathan Margulies
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application for Strike Out and Summary Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claim is barred by cause of action estoppel or issue estoppel due to prior proceedings
- 2 Whether the claim constitutes an abuse of process under Henderson v Henderson
- 3 Whether the claim has a realistic prospect of success warranting a trial
Ratio Decidendi
The claim is barred by cause of action estoppel and issue estoppel as the facts and issues were previously litigated and decided against Stephen in the 1997 proceedings and Court of Appeal. No special circumstances or new material evidence justify re-opening the matter. The claim is also an abuse of process and has no realistic prospect of success.
Court Disposition
Claim struck out
Orders
- The claim is struck out as barred by cause of action estoppel and/or issue estoppel.
- Alternatively, the claim is struck out as an abuse of process.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment