R v Marcus Taylor

R v Marcus Taylor

The findings of severe psychological harm, particular vulnerability, and significant planning were open to the trial judge based on the evidence, and the uplift in sentence to reflect concurrent offences and previous conviction was not manifestly excessive; therefore, the appeal against sentence is dismissed.

Parties
Appellant: Marcus Taylor; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
06 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Rape, Sexual Assault, Sentencing, Appeal, Psychological Harm, Vulnerability, Planning, Totality
Criminal Law Rape Sexual Assault Sentencing Appeal Psychological Harm Vulnerability Planning +1 more

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marcus Taylor

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive
  2. 2 Whether the judge was wrong to find severe psychological harm
  3. 3 Whether the judge was wrong to find particular vulnerability due to personal circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The findings of severe psychological harm, particular vulnerability, and significant planning were open to the trial judge based on the evidence, and the uplift in sentence to reflect concurrent offences and previous conviction was not manifestly excessive; therefore, the appeal against sentence is dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal against sentence dismissed.