Director of Public Prosecutions v Baker
The justices erred in excluding evidence of harassment prior to 10th October 2002; for a continuing offence, evidence of the entire course of conduct is admissible if at least one incident falls within the limitation period, and such evidence is also admissible as relevant background.
- Parties
- Claimant: Director of Public Prosecutions; Defendant: Margaret Baker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (case Stated) / Appeal From Magistrates' Court Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; question answered in the negative; no order for rehearing.
- Legal Topics
- Harassment, Summary Offences, Limitation Periods, Admissibility of Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Director of Public Prosecutions
Claimant
Margaret Baker
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (case Stated) / Appeal From Magistrates' Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether evidence of harassment prior to 10th October 2002 was inadmissible due to the six-month limitation period for summary offences
- 2 Whether the offence of harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 is a continuing offence permitting consideration of conduct outside the six-month period
Ratio Decidendi
The justices erred in excluding evidence of harassment prior to 10th October 2002; for a continuing offence, evidence of the entire course of conduct is admissible if at least one incident falls within the limitation period, and such evidence is also admissible as relevant background.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; question answered in the negative; no order for rehearing.
Orders
- Order for Legal Aid taxation if required.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment