R v Mariama Bah

R v Mariama Bah

There were no arguable grounds for appeal against conviction or sentence; the judge's approach to evidence and sentencing was correct and supported by medical evidence and victim statements.

Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Mariama Bah; Victim: AK
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 June 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
Legal Topics
Grievous Bodily Harm, Sentencing, Appeal Procedure
Criminal Law Grievous Bodily Harm Sentencing Appeal Procedure

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Mariama Bah

Applicant

AK

Victim

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 whether conviction for causing grievous bodily harm with intent was safe
  2. 2 whether sentence of eight years' imprisonment was manifestly excessive
  3. 3 whether extension of time for appeal should be granted

Ratio Decidendi

There were no arguable grounds for appeal against conviction or sentence; the judge's approach to evidence and sentencing was correct and supported by medical evidence and victim statements.

Court Disposition

applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused

Orders

  • extension of time for appeal refused
  • no further action