Jean-Michel Canarapen v Marie Ginette Gauchenot
The Deed of Variation was delivered unconditionally and is binding; the Defendant's alleged mistake was not sufficiently serious or causative to warrant rescission; delivery was not conditional; late amendment to plead conditional delivery was refused due to prejudice and lack of arguability.
- Parties
- Claimant: Jean-Michel Canarapen; Defendant: Marie Ginette Gauchenot
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; Defendant's counterclaim dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Deed of Variation, Delivery of Deed, Mistake in Gifts, Setting Aside Gifts, Conditional Delivery, Probate, Estate Distribution
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jean-Michel Canarapen
Claimant
Marie Ginette Gauchenot
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Deed of Variation was validly delivered and binding
- 2 Whether the Deed can be set aside for mistake
- 3 Whether delivery of the Deed was conditional
Ratio Decidendi
The Deed of Variation was delivered unconditionally and is binding; the Defendant's alleged mistake was not sufficiently serious or causative to warrant rescission; delivery was not conditional; late amendment to plead conditional delivery was refused due to prejudice and lack of arguability.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; Defendant's counterclaim dismissed.
Orders
- Declaration that the Deed of Variation dated 10 October 2022 is valid and binding on the Defendant.
- Defendant's counterclaim to set aside the Deed for mistake dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment