Gustavson & Ors v R. [2025] EWCA Crim 493 (30 April 2025)
The Sentencing Council guideline for causing grievous bodily harm with intent applies to cases involving consensual extreme body modification. Consent is a relevant factor that may reduce culpability but does not remove criminality or justify a separate lower culpability category. The judge was correct to apply the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 493
- Parties
- Appellant: Marius Gustavson; Appellant: David Carruthers; Appellant: Janus Atkin; Appellant: Damien Byrnes; Appellant: Jacob Crimi-Appleby; Appellant: Ashley Williams; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeals dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Consent in Offences Against the Person, Grievous Bodily Harm, Sentencing Guidelines, Conspiracy, Possession of Criminal Property, Indecent Images, Extreme Pornography
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marius Gustavson
Appellant
David Carruthers
Appellant
Janus Atkin
Appellant
Damien Byrnes
Appellant
Jacob Crimi-Appleby
Appellant
Ashley Williams
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Sentencing Council guideline for causing grievous bodily harm with intent applies to consensual extreme body modification
- 2 Appropriate categorisation of harm and culpability under the guideline in cases of consensual injury
- 3 Appropriate reduction in sentence for consent and for guilty plea
Ratio Decidendi
The Sentencing Council guideline for causing grievous bodily harm with intent applies to cases involving consensual extreme body modification. Consent is a relevant factor that may reduce culpability but does not remove criminality or justify a separate lower culpability category. The judge was correct to apply the guideline, categorise harm and culpability as high, and make reductions for consent and plea based on individual circumstances. The minimum term and life sentence imposed on Gustavson were not manifestly excessive given the gravity, planning, and risk involved.
Court Disposition
Appeals dismissed
Orders
- Sentences of all appellants affirmed
- No reduction in minimum term or life sentence for Gustavson
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment