Gustavson & Ors v R. [2025] EWCA Crim 493 (30 April 2025)

Gustavson & Ors v R. [2025] EWCA Crim 493 (30 April 2025)

The Sentencing Council guideline for causing grievous bodily harm with intent applies to cases involving consensual extreme body modification. Consent is a relevant factor that may reduce culpability but does not remove criminality or justify a separate lower culpability category. The judge was correct to apply the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2025] EWCA Crim 493
Parties
Appellant: Marius Gustavson; Appellant: David Carruthers; Appellant: Janus Atkin; Appellant: Damien Byrnes; Appellant: Jacob Crimi-Appleby; Appellant: Ashley Williams; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 April 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence
Outcome
Appeals dismissed
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Consent in Offences Against the Person, Grievous Bodily Harm, Sentencing Guidelines, Conspiracy, Possession of Criminal Property, Indecent Images, Extreme Pornography
Criminal Law Sentencing Consent in Offences Against the Person Grievous Bodily Harm Sentencing Guidelines Conspiracy Possession of Criminal Property Indecent Images +1 more

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Marius Gustavson

Appellant

David Carruthers

Appellant

Janus Atkin

Appellant

Damien Byrnes

Appellant

Jacob Crimi-Appleby

Appellant

Ashley Williams

Appellant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment on Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the Sentencing Council guideline for causing grievous bodily harm with intent applies to consensual extreme body modification
  2. 2 Appropriate categorisation of harm and culpability under the guideline in cases of consensual injury
  3. 3 Appropriate reduction in sentence for consent and for guilty plea

Ratio Decidendi

The Sentencing Council guideline for causing grievous bodily harm with intent applies to cases involving consensual extreme body modification. Consent is a relevant factor that may reduce culpability but does not remove criminality or justify a separate lower culpability category. The judge was correct to apply the guideline, categorise harm and culpability as high, and make reductions for consent and plea based on individual circumstances. The minimum term and life sentence imposed on Gustavson were not manifestly excessive given the gravity, planning, and risk involved.

Court Disposition

Appeals dismissed

Orders

  • Sentences of all appellants affirmed
  • No reduction in minimum term or life sentence for Gustavson