Cruddas v Adams

Cruddas v Adams

The defendant published repeated, serious, and false allegations of criminality against the claimant, aggravating the injury by his conduct and refusal to withdraw the allegations until the last moment. The gravity of the libel, its wide publication, and the need for vindication justified an award of £45,000 in damages.

Parties
Claimant: Peter Cruddas; Defendant: Mark Adams
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 February 2013
Procedural Posture
Defamation (libel) / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant. Damages assessed.
Legal Topics
Libel, Damages, Injunctions, Aggravated Damages, Vindication
Defamation Media Law Libel Damages Injunctions Aggravated Damages Vindication

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Peter Cruddas

Claimant

Mark Adams

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Defamation (libel) / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the defendant's publications were defamatory of the claimant
  2. 2 Assessment of appropriate compensatory damages for libel
  3. 3 Consideration of aggravating and mitigating factors in damages

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant published repeated, serious, and false allegations of criminality against the claimant, aggravating the injury by his conduct and refusal to withdraw the allegations until the last moment. The gravity of the libel, its wide publication, and the need for vindication justified an award of £45,000 in damages.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant. Damages assessed.

Orders

  • The defendant shall pay the claimant £45,000 in damages.
  • A permanent injunction restraining the defendant from repeating the allegations of illegality.