Castle, R v [2004] EWCA Crim 2758 (13 October 2004)

Castle, R v [2004] EWCA Crim 2758 (13 October 2004)

The conviction for arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered cannot stand due to the change in the legal definition of recklessness; a verdict of guilty of causing criminal damage with intent to damage property is substituted.

Citation
[2004] EWCA Crim 2758
Parties
Appellant: Mark Anthony Castle; Respondent: The Crown
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
13 October 2004
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
appeal allowed, conviction for aggravated arson quashed, substituted conviction for criminal damage by arson, sentence reduced
Legal Topics
Arson, Recklessness, Criminal Damage, Appeal, Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mark Anthony Castle

Appellant

The Crown

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the conviction for arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered can stand after the House of Lords decision in R v G
  2. 2 Whether a verdict of simple arson should be substituted
  3. 3 Appropriate sentence for criminal damage by arson

Ratio Decidendi

The conviction for arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered cannot stand due to the change in the legal definition of recklessness; a verdict of guilty of causing criminal damage with intent to damage property is substituted.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed, conviction for aggravated arson quashed, substituted conviction for criminal damage by arson, sentence reduced

Orders

  • Conviction for arson being reckless as to whether life was endangered quashed
  • Verdict of guilty of causing criminal damage with intent to damage property substituted