Jackson, R v [2019] EWCA Crim 1461 (7 August 2019)
The jury was properly directed to be sure that the applicant intended to kill or cause really serious injury; Jogee does not assist a defendant convicted on that basis. No substantial injustice is demonstrated to justify exceptional leave to appeal out of time.
- Citation
- [2019] EWCA Crim 1461
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Mark Anthony Jackson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Joint Enterprise, Murder, Appeal Out of Time, Secondary Participation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Mark Anthony Jackson
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the change in law on joint enterprise in R v Jogee justifies exceptional leave to appeal out of time against conviction for murder
- 2 Whether the jury's verdict would have been different under the law as restated in Jogee
Ratio Decidendi
The jury was properly directed to be sure that the applicant intended to kill or cause really serious injury; Jogee does not assist a defendant convicted on that basis. No substantial injustice is demonstrated to justify exceptional leave to appeal out of time.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- renewed application for extension of time and leave to appeal against conviction is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment