Jackson, R v
The application was refused because the jury was properly directed on the need to find intent to kill or cause really serious injury, and the evidence supported the conviction. The change in law in Jogee would not have altered the outcome, and no substantial injustice was demonstrated.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Mark Anthony Jackson
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 07 August 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Joint Enterprise, Murder, Appeal Out of Time, Secondary Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Mark Anthony Jackson
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Supreme Court decision in R v Jogee [2016] UKSC 8 provides grounds for exceptional leave to appeal out of time against conviction for murder under joint enterprise principles.
- 2 Whether the applicant suffered substantial injustice under the new legal standard.
Ratio Decidendi
The application was refused because the jury was properly directed on the need to find intent to kill or cause really serious injury, and the evidence supported the conviction. The change in law in Jogee would not have altered the outcome, and no substantial injustice was demonstrated.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Renewed application for extension of time and leave to appeal conviction is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment