Barnfather, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1449 (17 October 2025)
The Recorder was entitled to reach the view that a reduction of six months appropriately represented the mitigating features and the fact that these were attempts. The sentence was not manifestly excessive. However, the imposition of an indefinite SHPO was disproportionate; a 10-year term was appropriate given the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1449
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Mark Barnfather
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; SHPO varied to 10 years; sentence otherwise upheld.
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Sentencing, Sexual Harm Prevention Orders, Mitigation, Mental Health in Sentencing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Mark Barnfather
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the custodial sentence was manifestly excessive given the mitigation available
- 2 Whether the Sexual Harm Prevention Order (SHPO) should have been imposed for an indefinite period
Ratio Decidendi
The Recorder was entitled to reach the view that a reduction of six months appropriately represented the mitigating features and the fact that these were attempts. The sentence was not manifestly excessive. However, the imposition of an indefinite SHPO was disproportionate; a 10-year term was appropriate given the risk and need for public protection.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; SHPO varied to 10 years; sentence otherwise upheld.
Orders
- Quash the indefinite SHPO and substitute a 10-year SHPO commencing 7 March 2025
- Dismiss the remainder of the appeal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment