Scully, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 2288 (05 December 2013)

Scully, R. v [2013] EWCA Crim 2288 (05 December 2013)

The jury's conviction on count 2 was supported by the appellant's admission and independent evidence of assault, while acquittals on counts 1 and 3 could rationally be explained by insufficient evidence; the combined 'Watson' and majority direction did not create undue pressure on the jury; the sentence was justified by the gravity of the offence and the evidence.

Citation
[2013] EWCA Crim 2288
Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Mark Christopher Scully
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
05 December 2013
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From Crown Court
Outcome
Appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal sentence refused.
Legal Topics
Sexual Offences, Appeals, Jury Directions, Sentencing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 9 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Mark Christopher Scully

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence From Crown Court

  1. 1 Whether the conviction on count 2 (assault by penetration) was logically inconsistent with acquittals on counts 1 and 3
  2. 2 Whether the judge's combined 'Watson' and majority direction rendered the verdict unsafe
  3. 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive

Ratio Decidendi

The jury's conviction on count 2 was supported by the appellant's admission and independent evidence of assault, while acquittals on counts 1 and 3 could rationally be explained by insufficient evidence; the combined 'Watson' and majority direction did not create undue pressure on the jury; the sentence was justified by the gravity of the offence and the evidence.

Court Disposition

Appeal against conviction dismissed; application for leave to appeal sentence refused.