Mark Cooper v Office of Fair Trading
Mr Cooper is not a fit person to hold a consumer credit licence due to his recent conviction for dishonesty, ongoing lack of candour with regulatory authorities, failure to disclose disciplinary action, and dishonesty before the tribunal. Undertakings cannot remedy fundamental dishonesty. The appeal is dismissed and costs are awarded against Mr Cooper.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mark Cooper; Respondent: The Office of Fair Trading
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Consumer Credit Licence Revocation Appeal / Appeal Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; determination to revoke licence confirmed
- Legal Topics
- Licence Revocation, Dishonesty, Disclosure Obligations, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Cooper
Appellant
The Office of Fair Trading
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consumer Credit Licence Revocation Appeal / Appeal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Cooper is a fit person to hold a consumer credit licence under the Consumer Credit Act 1974
- 2 Whether failure to disclose disciplinary action by the Financial Services Authority constitutes dishonesty
- 3 Whether lying to the adjudicator and tribunal affects fitness for a licence
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Cooper is not a fit person to hold a consumer credit licence due to his recent conviction for dishonesty, ongoing lack of candour with regulatory authorities, failure to disclose disciplinary action, and dishonesty before the tribunal. Undertakings cannot remedy fundamental dishonesty. The appeal is dismissed and costs are awarded against Mr Cooper.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; determination to revoke licence confirmed
Orders
- Mr Cooper to pay the costs of the Office of Fair Trading of the appeal, to be assessed by the tribunal if not agreed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment