Dorling, R. v [2007] EWCA Crim 1579 (12 June 2007)
The trial judge's summing-up was balanced and addressed all essential defence points, including caution regarding prosecution witnesses and the absence of scientific evidence. No cumulative or individual ground rendered the conviction unsafe, and the sentence was not excessive given the aggravating factors.
- Citation
- [2007] EWCA Crim 1579
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Mark Dorling
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 June 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Appeals, Jury Directions, Confession Evidence, Forensic Evidence, Bad Character Evidence, Cell Site Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Mark Dorling
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge failed to provide a balanced summary of the defence case
- 2 Whether the trial judge failed to provide a balanced summary of Sarita Williams' evidence
- 3 Whether the trial judge failed to address the absence of scientific evidence
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge's summing-up was balanced and addressed all essential defence points, including caution regarding prosecution witnesses and the absence of scientific evidence. No cumulative or individual ground rendered the conviction unsafe, and the sentence was not excessive given the aggravating factors.
Court Disposition
renewed applications for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
Orders
- renewed application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
- renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment