Driver And Vehicle Standards Agency v Rowe
A vehicle permanently fitted with a substantial generator inside, forming part of the equipment of the show, can qualify as a 'showman’s goods vehicle' under section 62 of the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994, even if the adaptation is not externally visible. The statutory language does not require the special body or superstructure to be apparent from the outside; internal alterations may suffice if they are permanent and substantial.
- Parties
- Claimant: Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency; Defendant: Mark John Rowe
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 30 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed on the operator’s licence issue; guidance given on the tachograph exemption issue.
- Legal Topics
- Operator’s Licence Exemption, Tachograph Requirements, Showman’s Goods Vehicle Definition, Statutory Construction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency
Claimant
Mark John Rowe
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Appeal by Way of Case Stated / High Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a vehicle permanently fitted with a generator inside qualifies as 'a goods vehicle permanently fitted with some other special type of body or superstructure forming part of the equipment of the show' under section 62 of the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994
- 2 Whether the exemption from tachograph requirements under Article 13 of EC Regulation 561/2006 applies in these circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
A vehicle permanently fitted with a substantial generator inside, forming part of the equipment of the show, can qualify as a 'showman’s goods vehicle' under section 62 of the Vehicle Excise and Registration Act 1994, even if the adaptation is not externally visible. The statutory language does not require the special body or superstructure to be apparent from the outside; internal alterations may suffice if they are permanent and substantial.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed on the operator’s licence issue; guidance given on the tachograph exemption issue.
Orders
- The Deputy District Judge was correct in law to find that the special type of body or superstructure need not be externally visible and can comprise internal alterations.
- No order made on the tachograph exemption issue; guidance provided for future cases.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment