Zurich Insurance Plc v Kay & Ors [2014] EWHC 2734 (QB) (01 August 2014)
The evidence did not satisfy the criminal standard of proof that Mr Kay, his wife, and stepson lied about the location of the accident; peripheral lies and inconsistencies were insufficient to establish contempt on the central issue.
- Citation
- [2014] EWHC 2734 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Zurich Insurance Plc; Defendant: Mark Kay; Defendant: Karen Margaret Kay; Defendant: Daniel Kay
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 August 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Committal Application for Contempt of Court / Judgment After Contested Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for committal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Contempt of Court, Fraudulent Claims, Witness Credibility, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Zurich Insurance Plc
Claimant
Mark Kay
Defendant
Karen Margaret Kay
Defendant
Daniel Kay
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Committal Application for Contempt of Court / Judgment After Contested Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants committed contempt of court by lying about the location of the accident in personal injury proceedings
Ratio Decidendi
The evidence did not satisfy the criminal standard of proof that Mr Kay, his wife, and stepson lied about the location of the accident; peripheral lies and inconsistencies were insufficient to establish contempt on the central issue.
Court Disposition
Application for committal dismissed
Orders
- Applications to commit Mark Kay, Karen Margaret Kay, and Daniel Kay for contempt of court are refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment