Gardiner v Tabet & Anor

Gardiner v Tabet & Anor

On balance of probabilities, the will dated 29 May 2017 was signed by Eric Tabet in the presence of two witnesses, with testamentary capacity and knowledge and approval of its contents. The evidence of the witnesses, medical records, and expert opinions support the conclusion that the statutory requirements were met.

Parties
Claimant: Mary-Ann Gardiner; Defendant: Mark Tabet; Defendant: Maia Tabet
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
15 March 2021
Procedural Posture
Probate / Final Judgment
Outcome
Will upheld as valid; probate granted to claimant
Legal Topics
Testamentary Capacity, Due Execution of Will, Knowledge and Approval, Intestacy, Will Forgery Allegations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mary-Ann Gardiner

Claimant

Mark Tabet

Defendant

Maia Tabet

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Probate / Final Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the will dated 29 May 2017 was duly executed by Eric Tabet
  2. 2 Whether Eric Tabet had testamentary capacity at the time of execution
  3. 3 Whether Eric Tabet knew and approved the contents of the will

Ratio Decidendi

On balance of probabilities, the will dated 29 May 2017 was signed by Eric Tabet in the presence of two witnesses, with testamentary capacity and knowledge and approval of its contents. The evidence of the witnesses, medical records, and expert opinions support the conclusion that the statutory requirements were met.

Court Disposition

Will upheld as valid; probate granted to claimant

Orders

  • The will dated 29 May 2017 is admitted to probate.
  • Mary-Ann Gardiner is entitled to the estate of Eric Tabet as sole beneficiary.