Mark Thomas v Information Commissioner

Mark Thomas v Information Commissioner

The Tribunal struck out the application because the Information Commissioner had already provided an outcome to Mr Thomas's complaint, and no further procedural steps were identified as omitted. The application had no reasonable prospects of success under Section 166 DPA18.

Parties
Appellant: Mark Thomas; Respondent: Information Commissioner
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
30 April 2026
Procedural Posture
Information Rights Appeal / Strike Out Application Determined on the Papers
Outcome
Application struck out
Legal Topics
Section 166 Data Protection Act 2018, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Procedural Requirements for Complaints, Strike Out Applications

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mark Thomas

Appellant

Information Commissioner

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Information Rights Appeal / Strike Out Application Determined on the Papers

  1. 1 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction under Section 166 DPA18 to consider the application
  2. 2 Whether the Information Commissioner failed to take appropriate procedural steps in relation to the complaint
  3. 3 Whether the application has any reasonable prospects of success

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal struck out the application because the Information Commissioner had already provided an outcome to Mr Thomas's complaint, and no further procedural steps were identified as omitted. The application had no reasonable prospects of success under Section 166 DPA18.

Court Disposition

Application struck out

Orders

  • The application is struck out pursuant to rule 8(3)(c) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (General Regulatory Chamber) Rules 2009.