Cadogan Petroleum Plc & Ors v Tolley & Ors [2009] EWHC 3291 (Ch) (16 December 2009)
Applicants are entitled to disclosure of those parts of the Settlement Agreement necessary for fair and just disposal of the trial; confidentiality concerns of former GPS Defendants must be protected, and only relevant parts should be disclosed, not the entire agreement.
- Citation
- [2009] EWHC 3291 (Ch)
- Parties
- Claimant: Cadogan Petroleum Plc; Claimant: Cadogan Petroleum Holdings Ltd; Claimant: LLC Astroinvest-Ukraine; Claimant: US Enco Ukraine; Defendant: Mark Tolley; Defendant: Marksman International Ltd; Defendant: Natural Resource Ltd; Defendant: Vasyl Vivcharyk; Defendant: VPV Oil Investments LLC; Defendant: Smith Eurasia Ltd; Defendant: Vladimir Shlimak; Defendant: SonicGauge Inc; Defendant: Global Process Systems LLC; Defendant: Global Process Systems Inc; Defendant: Clint Elgar; Defendant: Anthony Wright; Defendant: Wayne Goranson; Defendant: AOE Energy Inc; Defendant: Philip March
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Disclosure Application in Ongoing Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application granted in principle; disclosure ordered of relevant parts of Settlement Agreement only.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Confidentiality, Settlement Agreements, Contribution Between Tortfeasors, Mitigation of Loss
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cadogan Petroleum Plc
Claimant
Cadogan Petroleum Holdings Ltd
Claimant
LLC Astroinvest-Ukraine
Claimant
US Enco Ukraine
Claimant
Mark Tolley
Defendant
Marksman International Ltd
Defendant
Natural Resource Ltd
Defendant
Vasyl Vivcharyk
Defendant
VPV Oil Investments LLC
Defendant
Smith Eurasia Ltd
Defendant
Vladimir Shlimak
Defendant
SonicGauge Inc
Defendant
Global Process Systems LLC
Defendant
Global Process Systems Inc
Defendant
Clint Elgar
Defendant
Anthony Wright
Defendant
Wayne Goranson
Defendant
AOE Energy Inc
Defendant
Philip March
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Disclosure Application in Ongoing Civil Proceedings / Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Settlement Agreement should be disclosed to remaining defendants
- 2 Extent of disclosure required for fair disposal of proceedings
- 3 Balancing confidentiality against necessity for fair trial
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants are entitled to disclosure of those parts of the Settlement Agreement necessary for fair and just disposal of the trial; confidentiality concerns of former GPS Defendants must be protected, and only relevant parts should be disclosed, not the entire agreement.
Court Disposition
Application granted in principle; disclosure ordered of relevant parts of Settlement Agreement only.
Orders
- Claimants to disclose relevant parts of Settlement Agreement necessary for fair disposal of proceedings.
- Inspection mechanism to be agreed between parties or ordered by court if not agreed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment