Cadogan Petroleum Plc & Ors v Tolley & Ors
The Claimants are permitted to use the cross-examination transcript at trial if Mr Tolley serves a witness statement, as the material is relevant to tracing assets and credibility. However, if Mr Tolley does not serve evidence, the material may not be used as part of the Claimants' primary case.
- Parties
- Claimant: Cadogan Petroleum Plc; Claimant: Cadogan Petroleum Holdings Ltd; Claimant: LLC Astroinvest-Ukraine; Claimant: US Enco Ukraine; Defendant: Mark Tolley; Defendant: Marksman International Ltd; Defendant: Natural Resource Ltd; Defendant: Vasyl Vivcharyk; Defendant: VPV Oil Investments LLC; Defendant: Smith Eurasia Ltd; Defendant: Vladimir Shlimak; Defendant: SonicGauge Inc; Defendant: Global Process Systems LLC; Defendant: Global Process Systems Inc; Defendant: Clint Elgar; Defendant: Anthony Wright; Defendant: Wayne Goranson; Defendant: AOE Energy Inc; Defendant: Philip March
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 October 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application (case Management)
- Outcome
- Application allowed with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Use of Cross Examination Transcripts, Freezing Orders, Undertakings, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cadogan Petroleum Plc
Claimant
Cadogan Petroleum Holdings Ltd
Claimant
LLC Astroinvest-Ukraine
Claimant
US Enco Ukraine
Claimant
Mark Tolley
Defendant
Marksman International Ltd
Defendant
Natural Resource Ltd
Defendant
Vasyl Vivcharyk
Defendant
VPV Oil Investments LLC
Defendant
Smith Eurasia Ltd
Defendant
Vladimir Shlimak
Defendant
SonicGauge Inc
Defendant
Global Process Systems LLC
Defendant
Global Process Systems Inc
Defendant
Clint Elgar
Defendant
Anthony Wright
Defendant
Wayne Goranson
Defendant
AOE Energy Inc
Defendant
Philip March
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application (case Management)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimants may use the transcript of Mr Tolley's cross-examination at trial
- 2 Whether the restriction on use of cross-examination evidence should be maintained
Ratio Decidendi
The Claimants are permitted to use the cross-examination transcript at trial if Mr Tolley serves a witness statement, as the material is relevant to tracing assets and credibility. However, if Mr Tolley does not serve evidence, the material may not be used as part of the Claimants' primary case.
Court Disposition
Application allowed with conditions
Orders
- Claimants may use the cross-examination transcript at trial if Mr Tolley serves a witness statement.
- Restriction on use for criminal or contempt proceedings remains unless varied by court order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment