Cadogan Petroleum Plc & Ors v Tolley & Ors
Applicants are entitled to disclosure of those parts of the Settlement Agreement necessary for fair and just disposal of the trial, subject to mechanisms to protect confidentiality. Unlimited inspection is not granted; only relevant parts may be disclosed.
- Parties
- Claimant: Cadogan Petroleum Plc; Claimant: Cadogan Petroleum Holdings Ltd; Claimant: LLC Astroinvest-Ukraine; Claimant: US Enco Ukraine; Defendant: Mark Tolley; Defendant: Marksman International Ltd; Defendant: Natural Resource Ltd; Defendant: Vasyl Vivcharyk; Defendant: VPV Oil Investments LLC; Defendant: Smith Eurasia Ltd; Defendant: Vladimir Shlimak; Defendant: SonicGauge Inc; Defendant: Global Process Systems LLC; Defendant: Global Process Systems Inc; Defendant: Clint Elgar; Defendant: Anthony Wright; Defendant: Wayne Goranson; Defendant: AOE Energy Inc; Defendant: Philip March
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure
- Outcome
- Applications granted in principle for partial disclosure.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Confidentiality, Settlement Agreements, Fair Trial, Contribution, Mitigation of Loss
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Cadogan Petroleum Plc
Claimant
Cadogan Petroleum Holdings Ltd
Claimant
LLC Astroinvest-Ukraine
Claimant
US Enco Ukraine
Claimant
Mark Tolley
Defendant
Marksman International Ltd
Defendant
Natural Resource Ltd
Defendant
Vasyl Vivcharyk
Defendant
VPV Oil Investments LLC
Defendant
Smith Eurasia Ltd
Defendant
Vladimir Shlimak
Defendant
SonicGauge Inc
Defendant
Global Process Systems LLC
Defendant
Global Process Systems Inc
Defendant
Clint Elgar
Defendant
Anthony Wright
Defendant
Wayne Goranson
Defendant
AOE Energy Inc
Defendant
Philip March
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Interlocutory Application for Disclosure
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to disclosure and inspection of the Settlement Agreement.
- 2 Whether confidentiality can bar disclosure of relevant parts of the Settlement Agreement.
- 3 Whether disclosure is necessary for fair disposal of the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
Applicants are entitled to disclosure of those parts of the Settlement Agreement necessary for fair and just disposal of the trial, subject to mechanisms to protect confidentiality. Unlimited inspection is not granted; only relevant parts may be disclosed.
Court Disposition
Applications granted in principle for partial disclosure.
Orders
- Applicants entitled to disclosure of relevant parts of the Settlement Agreement necessary for fair disposal of the trial.
- Inspection mechanism to be agreed between parties or ordered by the court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment