Mark Tully v The Information Commissioner
Requests 4 and 5 of the appellant's information request were vexatious due to the disproportionate burden of compliance relative to their limited value, justifying reliance on section 14 FOIA. Requests 1-3 were not vexatious as they imposed no significant burden and should not have been refused under section 14.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mark Tully; Respondent: The Information Commissioner
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Decision on the Papers
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information, Vexatious Requests, Section 14 FOIA, Public Authority Disclosure, Loan Charge
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mark Tully
Appellant
The Information Commissioner
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (general Regulatory Chamber) Decision on the Papers
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HM Treasury was entitled to rely on section 14 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to refuse parts of the appellant's information request as vexatious.
Ratio Decidendi
Requests 4 and 5 of the appellant's information request were vexatious due to the disproportionate burden of compliance relative to their limited value, justifying reliance on section 14 FOIA. Requests 1-3 were not vexatious as they imposed no significant burden and should not have been refused under section 14.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- HM Treasury were not entitled to rely on section 14 FOIA for requests 1-3 made on 1 February 2022.
- HM Treasury were entitled to rely on section 14 FOIA for requests 4 and 5 made on 1 February 2022.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment