Walker, R. v
The sentences, including the activation and reduction of the suspended sentence and the imposition of consecutive terms, were appropriate and unimpeachable given the applicant's persistent offending and breach of trust.
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Applicant: Mark Walker
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 09 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- application refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Breach of Suspended Sentence, Theft, Possession of Bladed Article
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Mark Walker
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether the consecutive sentences and activation of the suspended sentence were appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The sentences, including the activation and reduction of the suspended sentence and the imposition of consecutive terms, were appropriate and unimpeachable given the applicant's persistent offending and breach of trust.
Court Disposition
application refused
Orders
- Leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment